Should the next GTA take itself more seriously? (pic: Rockstar Games)The Tuesday Inbox hears some horror stories of how much people spend on microtransactions, as one reader talks up Mass Effect multiplayer.
To join in with the discussions yourself email email@example.com
You cannot be seriousI think there’s something people are forgetting when it comes to the eternal debate of why GTA 6 hasn’t been announced yet and that’s the fact that a lot of people who worked on GTA 5, and many of the original games, have now left Rockstar. Producer and designer Leslie Benzies leaving is a massive blow, that people don’t realise because he’s not famous (something Rockstar ensures on purpose).
Jeffrey Crawford ‘Lazlow’ Jones, who did a lot of the writing, has gone and so too has co-founder Dan Houser, who did even more of the writing. The original crew just isn’t there any more to make another GTA, so they’ll have to rely on new talent, which could go either way.
Then there’s the question of how do you satirise modern America in a post-Trump world? Even if you tried there’s the fairly serious monetary consideration that a lot of the people playing the game are probably all for him and what he stands for.
Before he left, Dan Houser said Trump’s America was beyond parody and you couldn’t do it, and I think he meant that literally in terms of purposefully not releasing a game during that time. Whether Rockstar thinks things have got a bit easier since then I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
I think one idea may be to play things more straight and not only have no satire, or not much, but make the characters realistic and have it be a real drama. I really think GTA 5 took things as far as they could go in the old direction, so maybe it’s time to try something new?Deltoid
Developer victoryAnyone that thought Microsoft bought Bethesda just so they could see Starfield sell more on the PlayStation 5 has been taking more crazy pills than is healthy. I know, for some reason, that’s sort of what they pretended they were going to do at first but now the pretence is gone and even by their own admission it’s blatantly an exclusive.
Not coming out this year is a bit of surprise though, but perhaps a good thing as it means that the rumoured argument between Bethesda and Microsoft, over when it should be released, has been won by Bethesda, which is encouraging for the future.
So what does that mean for Christmas, is what I’m wondering. Halo Infinite obviously, but there’s nothing else that seems guaranteed. Another reader said something similar when he said that Sony’s only guaranteed(-ish) game was Horizon Forbidden West, which means the real battle could be between games we’ve never heard of yet. Which I find exciting.
Of course, it could mean that those are the only two games, which wouldn’t be exciting. But I am going to try and stay more optimistic than that.Kraften
The wrong leakI often wonder why publishers are so desperate to keep video game footage secret when what it shows is… exactly what you would’ve expected. I can understand in the old days companies like Nintendo were worried others would copy them before they had a chance to get their game out, which was totally a valid concern. But The Division already exists and the fact that it’s free-to-play is the unique bit, not the fact that it’s set in a different town.
I know I’m being naïve here and probably Ubisoft are going to sue whoever leaked it to hell, especially as they know EXACTLY WHO DID IT because their number is all over the screen, but it’s just such an unexciting leak. Why does no one ever leak the new God Of War or Elden Ring. You know, something where you don’t actually know what it’ll be? (Yes, I know Elden Ring leaked but it was literally three seconds long.)Maestro
GC: The Last Of Us Part 2 suffered a very substantial leak before launch, it can happen with any game or company.
E-mail your comments to: firstname.lastname@example.org
You know his nameIt struck me the other day that we haven’t heard anything on Super Smash Bros. in a while and I wondered if Nintendo does have new games and IP on the way if they might end up announcing it through Smash or at least having that same character in it as DLC, maybe even free DLC?
In typical Nintendo fashion I don’t think they really make the most of the potential of the game in terms of hyping up new games but I think it could work really well. Almost every Nintendo owners plays Smash so anything that’s new in that, especially if it’s free, would catch everyone’s attention. If this is what happens at E3 then just call me Nostradamus.Pete
Green with envyJust watched the new trailer for Mario Golf: Super Rush.
Birdo, who I have used since 2001 on GameCube and 3DS has been omitted for some random dude called Charging Chuck. Yes, he was in Super Mario World but there were many of ‘em and they have never played golf before. I am genuinely not happy.
Camelot or Nintendo are obviously not comfortable using Birdo in the current age. Read the NES booklet for Super Mario Bros. 2 to realise why.Birdo
GC: How do you know Chuck hasn’t played golf before? Maybe he was left out before because he was too good.
Expensive hobbyI 99% agree with Saturday’s weekend feature. I’ll never forget Call Of Duty: WW2 a bloke was at HQ opening box after box after box. I counted 89 he opened before I got kicked for not moving. I sent him a message and I asked him if they were in-game purchases. His reply was, ‘Yes, I bought the £85 COD Points bundle’. I asked him, ‘What’s the point? In less than 12 months’ time there will be a new Call Of Duty out’ and his reply was, ‘I only play COD so I’ll spend my money on that’. He even said he spends £85 a week on COD. I really don’t get it.
I remember when the Taken armour came out in Destiny, cost me £40. I will be honest, I loved it for three months till the new DLC came out and the Taken armour was last week’s must-have. Since that day I’ve never bought anything in-game again.
The 1% I didn’t agree with is Game Pass, I really don’t think it’s worth it. They’re charging you for games that came out not just last gen but Xbox 360 gen. I know there is a few new ones coming, and I mean a few, but not worth signing up and it’s going to go up. Xbox wanted to increase price until everyone moaned and the said it was a mistake, but it’s going to go up in the next 12 months.
Sony have PlayStation Now and I’m not interested. PlayStation Pass wouldn’t get me signed up either (if that’s what it’s called) but if gamers didn’t buy developers wouldn’t sell.David
Multiplayer EffectI hope they do add multiplayer to Mass Effect Legendary Edition. I still play Mass Effect: Andromeda multiplayer to this day. I love the Combo Primer Detonator aspect to it and generally I think the combat is excellent.
I play on PC and can still get a game with others without much waiting. Mass Effect 3’s multiplayer is generally considered even better, I believe, albeit I haven’t played that one. I would certainly get involved if they did it for the Legendary Edition.r-s-w
GC: We don’t know about better, but they are both surprisingly good.
Fly on the wallResident Evil Village Pitch meeting:
Game Director: OK so for the visual aesthetic we’re going to try cast back to the colour brown colour palette from Resident Evil 4, and also give it that Transylvanian vampire and werewolf vibe!Capcom Board: Oh, cool! RE4 is still often lauded as one of the best games ever made! I’m sure we can ride the hype train on that association… and vampires and werewolves, I love it! Are we going to tie into folklore and show how these legends tie into ‘real (Resident Evil) life’ genetic aberrations?Game Director: What?! Oh, lord no. We’re not doing that.Capcom Board: Oh, so then… why vampires?Game Director: No reason!Capcom Board: So we’re not going to explore that at all, or really justify it or tie it into the broader story in an interesting way… or anything?Game Director: NnnnopeCapcom Board: Uuuh, okay then…Game Director: Now, you brought up the story…Capcom Board: I did!Game Director: So now bear with me here… there ISN’T one!Capcom Board: Wut?Game Director: Well, not one that has any substantial connections to lore, internal logic, foreshadowing, drama or intrigue of any kind shape or form. Oh, and we’re gonna make Chris Redfield the bad guy… orat least absolutely terrible at his job.Capcom Board: Oh… I see.Game Director: Finally, we have gameplay…Capcom Board: Yes! Colour me interested, what are we bringing to this one?!Game Director: Well, remember everything that made RE7 feel at least half way like a breath of fresh air, and a satisfying gaming experience?Capcom Board: Yes!Game Director: We’re gonna rip nearly ALL of that out.Capcom Board: Oh.Game Director: Yup, all that stuff’s gone. In a dumpster. On fire.Capcom Board: Right.Game Director: Yes, we’re going to keep the sluggish movement and narrow field of view that worked in RE7, but we’re going to ramp up the combat and greatly increase enemy agility and enemy numbers!Capcom Board: Won’t that make the game frustrating?Game Director: Assuredly, yes! But that’s not all, we’re also going to make sure the game’s bosses are uninspired, and crucially, unresponsive to you when you’re fighting them so you don’t know whether you’re really even damaging them half the time.Capcom Board: So… I mean… this all sounds quite tedious.Game Director: Most likely yes, but it all scores highly in our focus tests so… shrugsCapcom Board sighs Listen, you do what you like, but make sure it all looks brown like Resident Evil4. It’ll sell like hot cakes!ArkadePerfekt
Inbox also-ransReally feel as though Google have missed a huge opportunity with Stadia. How amazing would it have been to team up with Nintendo and offer the Stadia service on the Switch?Digsy
Any idea when you might have your review of Mass Effect Legendary Edition finished, GC? I appreciate it’s a lot to go through but it’s frustrating when the only reviews on Metacritic are made up ones from sites you’ve never heard of.Benson
GC: We couldn’t say at the moment. We’re trying for this week but there is a mountain of content to get through and we don’t want to rush through it.
This week’s Hot TopicThe subject for this weekend’s Inbox was suggested by reader Clambake, who asks what’s the most annoyed you’ve ever got with a video game?
Do you feel your anger was justified and what exactly happened? Was it because the game was very difficult, had a stupid plot twist, or was there some kind of bug that ruined the experience? Or what about playing online, including against cheaters?
How often do you get angry playing games and have you ever broken a controller, or anything else, when getting upset? How have you learned to cope better and is there anything you now purposefully avoid?
E-mail your comments to: email@example.com
The small printNew Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers’ letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.
You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader’s Feature at any time, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.
You can also leave your comments below and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter.
MORE : Games Inbox: The future of Stadia, Resident Evil Village completion, and Nex Machina love
MORE : Weekend Hot Topic, part 1: Hated games that are actually good
MORE : Weekend Hot Topic, part 2: Hated games that are actually good
Follow Metro Gaming on Twitter and email us at firstname.lastname@example.org
For more stories like this, check our Gaming page.